Ursa Major II - Reproducing the observed properties through tidal disruption

TL;DR

This study shows that the observed properties of Ursa Major II can be explained by tidal disruption effects without dark matter, challenging previous assumptions about its dark matter content.

Contribution

The paper demonstrates through N-body simulations that tidal disruption alone can reproduce Ursa Major II's observed properties, questioning the necessity of dark matter in its mass estimates.

Findings

Tidal effects can explain velocity dispersion and morphology without dark matter.

An iterative method accurately estimates bound mass when >10% of initial mass remains.

Measurement uncertainties significantly affect mass overestimation.

Abstract

Recent deep photometry of the dwarf spheroidal Ursa Major II's morphology, and spectroscopy of individual stars, have provided a number of new constraints on its properties. With a velocity dispersion $\sim$6 km s$^{-1}$, and under the assumption that the galaxy is virialised, the mass-to-light ratio is found to be approaching $\sim$2000 - apparently heavily dark matter dominated. Using N-Body simulations, we demonstrate that the observed luminosity, ellipticity, irregular morphology, velocity gradient, and the velocity dispersion can be well reproduced through processes associated with tidal mass loss, and in the absence of dark matter. These results highlight the considerable uncertainty that exists in measurements of the dark matter content of Ursa Major II. The dynamics of the inner tidal tails, and tidal stream, causes the observed velocity dispersion of stars to be boosted to values of $>$5 km s$^{-1}$ ($>$20 km s$^{-1}$ at times). This effect is responsible for raising the velocity dispersion of our model to the observed values in UMaII. We test an iterative rejection technique for removing unbound stars from samples of UMaII stars whose positions on the sky, and line-of-sight velocities, are provided. We find this technique is very effective at providing an accurate bound mass from this information, and only fails when the galaxy has a bound mass less than 10$%$ of its initial mass. However when $<2%$ mass remains bound, mass overestimation by $>$3 orders of magnitude are seen. Additionally we find that mass measurements are sensitive to measurement uncertainty in line-of-sight velocities. Measurement uncertainties of 1-4 km s$^{-1}$ result in mass overestimates by a factor of $\sim$1.3-5.7.