Comparison of charge modulations in La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$ and YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6.6}$
V. Thampy, S. Blanco-Canosa, M. Garc\'ia-Fern\'andez, M. P. M. Dean,, G. D. Gu, M. F\"oerst, B. Keimer, M. Le Tacon, S. B. Wilkins, J. P. Hill

TL;DR
This study compares charge modulations in two cuprate superconductors, revealing similar order parameters but differing correlation lengths, advancing understanding of charge order phenomena in high-temperature superconductors.
Contribution
It provides a direct comparison of lattice charge modulations in La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$ and YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6.6}$ using soft x-ray scattering, highlighting similarities in order parameters.
Findings
Correlation length in La$_{1.875}$Ba$_{0.125}$CuO$_4$ is approximately 259 Å.
Correlation length in YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{6.6}$ is approximately 55 Å.
Order parameters of lattice modulations are of similar magnitude in both compounds.
Abstract
A charge modulation has recently been reported in (Y,Nd)BaCuO [Ghiringhelli {\em et al.} Science 337, 821 (2013)]. Here we report Cu edge soft x-ray scattering studies comparing the lattice modulation associated with the charge modulation in YBaCuO with that associated with the well known charge and spin stripe order in LaBaCuO. We find that the correlation length in the CuO plane is isotropic in both cases, and is \AA for LaBaCuO and \AA for YBaCuO. Assuming weak inter-planar correlations of the charge ordering in both compounds, we conclude that the order parameters of the lattice modulations in LaBaCuO and YBaCuO are of the same order of magnitude.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
