Investigating Deletion in Wikipedia
Bluma S. Gelley

TL;DR
This paper analyzes Wikipedia deletions to assess their justification, revealing many are appropriate but some occur too rapidly, and offers recommendations to improve content quality and editor retention.
Contribution
It provides a dataset of deleted articles and insights into deletion practices, proposing strategies to reduce non-significant pages and retain new editors.
Findings
Many deletions are justified
A large number of deletions occur quickly
Recommendations to improve retention and reduce non-significant pages
Abstract
Several hundred Wikipedia articles are deleted every day because they lack sufficient significance to be included in the encyclopedia. We collect a dataset of deleted articles and analyze them to determine whether or not the deletions were justified. We find evidence to support the hypothesis that many deletions are carried out correctly, but also find that a large number were done very quickly. Based on our conclusions, we make some recommendations to reduce the number of non-significant pages and simultaneously improve retention of new editors.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsWikis in Education and Collaboration · Digital Rights Management and Security · Cancer-related gene regulation
