Symmetric and asymmetric solitons in dual-core couplers with competing quadratic and cubic nonlinearities
Lazar Gubeskys, Boris A. Malomed (Dept. of Physical Electronics,, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the existence, stability, and bifurcation behavior of symmetric and asymmetric solitons in a dual-core coupler with competing quadratic and cubic nonlinearities, revealing complex bifurcation loops and stability properties.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive analysis of soliton bifurcations in dual-core systems with chi^(2) and chi^(3) nonlinearities, including the extended cascading approximation and stability of various soliton types.
Findings
Stable asymmetric solitons emerge via supercritical bifurcation.
Bifurcation loops can be concave when inter-core coupling is weak.
Single-color symmetric solitons are stable; asymmetric ones are unstable.
Abstract
We consider the model of a dual-core spatial-domain coupler with chi^(2) and chi^(3) nonlinearities acting in two parallel cores. We construct families of symmetric and asymmetric solitons in the system with self-defocusing chi^(3) terms, and test their stability. The transition from symmetric to asymmetric soliton branches, and back to the symmetric ones proceeds via a bifurcation loop. A pair of stable asymmetric branches emerge from the symmetric family via a supercritical bifurcation; eventually, the asymmetric branches merge back into the symmetric one through a reverse bifurcation. The existence of the loop is explained by means of an extended version of the cascading approximation for the chi^(2) interaction, which takes into regard the XPM part of the chi(3) interaction. When the inter-core coupling is weak, the bifurcation loop features a concave shape, with the asymmetric…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
