Note on a proposed proof of the Riemann Hypothesis by Jin Gyu Lee

TL;DR

This paper critically examines and refutes a proposed proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, demonstrating that the original arguments are incomplete and do not establish the conjecture.

Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis showing the flaws and incompleteness in the previous proof attempts of the Riemann Hypothesis.

Findings

The proposed proof is incomplete.

The argument claiming zeta(2s)=0 is flawed.

The refutation clarifies the logical gaps in the original proof.

Abstract

This is a reformulation and refutation of a proposed proof of the Riemann hypothesis published in 2013 (arXiv:1305.0323) and in 2014 (arXiv:1402.2822). Proceeding by contradiction, the author wants to prove that if zeta(s)=0 where 1/2<Re s<1, then zeta(2s)=0, which is known to be impossible. We show that both versions of the proof are incomplete.