Extracting information from a qubit by multiple observers: Toward a theory of sequential state discrimination
Janos Bergou, Edgar Feldman, and Mark Hillery

TL;DR
This paper investigates sequential unambiguous state discrimination on a single qubit by multiple observers, aiming to maximize the probability that each observer correctly identifies the state without errors, advancing the understanding of nondestructive quantum measurements.
Contribution
It introduces a framework for maximizing success probabilities in sequential unambiguous state discrimination, a step toward nondestructive quantum measurement theory.
Findings
Both Bob and Charlie can successfully identify the state with nonzero probability.
The success probability for Charlie depends on the residual information after Bob's measurement.
The residual information is quantified by the overlap between the post-measurement states.
Abstract
We discuss sequential unambiguous state-discrimination measurements performed on the same qubit. Alice prepares a qubit in one of two possible states. The qubit is first sent to Bob, who measures it, and then on to Charlie, who also measures it. The object in both cases is to determine which state Alice sent. In an unambiguous state discrimination measurement, we never make a mistake, i.e. misidentify the state, but the measurement may fail, in which case we gain no information about which state was sent. We find that there is a nonzero probability for both Bob and Charlie to identify the state, and we maximize this probability. The probability that Charlie's measurement succeeds depends on how much information about the state Alice sent is left in the qubit after Bob's measurement, and this information can be quantified by the overlap between the two possible states in which Bob's…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
