Perimeter-minimizing Tilings by Convex and Non-convex Pentagons
Whan Ghang, Zane Martin, Steven Waruhiu

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether the convexity assumption in a known theorem about perimeter-minimizing pentagon tilings is necessary, proving the theorem in some cases without this assumption and suggesting future research directions.
Contribution
It extends the perimeter-minimizing tiling theorem to include certain non-convex pentagons, removing the convexity requirement in specific cases.
Findings
The theorem holds for some non-convex pentagons.
Convexity may not be necessary for perimeter-minimizing tilings in certain scenarios.
Provides directions for further research on non-convex tilings.
Abstract
We study the presumably unnecessary convexity hypothesis in the theorem of Chung et al. [CFS] on perimeter-minimizing planar tilings by convex pentagons. We prove that the theorem holds without the convexity hypothesis in certain special cases, and we offer direction for future research.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPoint processes and geometric inequalities · Quasicrystal Structures and Properties · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
