A Witness Extraction Technique by Proof Normalization Based on Interactive Realizability
Giovanni Birolo

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel proof reduction method inspired by interactive realizability to extract witnesses from classical logic derivations in Heyting Arithmetic with restricted Law of Excluded Middle, enhancing proof mining.
Contribution
It proposes a new set of reductions for natural deduction that directly extract witnesses without encoding derivations, inspired by learning and falsifiable hypotheses.
Findings
Reductions differ significantly from existing methods.
Witnesses are extracted directly from derivations in HA+EM1.
Method is motivated by proof mining and interactive realizability.
Abstract
We present a new set of reductions for derivations in natural deduction that can extract witnesses from closed derivations of simply existential formulas in Heyting Arithmetic (HA) plus the Excluded Middle Law restricted to simply existential formulas (EM1), a system motivated by its interest in proof mining. The reduction we have for classical logic are quite different from all existing ones. They are inspired by the informal idea of learning by making falsifiable hypothesis and checking them, and by the interactive realizability interpretation. We extract the witnesses directly from derivations in HA+EM1 by reduction, without encoding derivations by a realizability interpretation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Semantic Web and Ontologies
