Classifying Topoi and Preservation of Higher Order Logic by Geometric Morphisms
Shawn J. Henry

TL;DR
This paper investigates how geometric morphisms between topoi preserve higher order logic, focusing on classifying topoi for internal geometric theories and establishing criteria for their preservation.
Contribution
It introduces a deduction calculus for internal geometric theories and demonstrates how to determine when a higher order theory is preserved by geometric morphisms.
Findings
A deduction calculus for internal geometric theories is developed.
A criterion for when a higher order theory's classifying topos is degenerate is established.
Applied to theories of Dedekind finite objects and field objects as rings.
Abstract
Topoi are categories which have enough structure to interpret higher order logic. They admit two notions of morphism: logical morphisms which preserve all of the structure and therefore the interpretation of higher order logic, and geometric morphisms which only preserve only some of the structure and therefore only some of the interpretation of higher order logic. The question then arises: what kinds of higher order theories are preserved by geometric morphisms? It is known that certain first order theories called internal geometric theories are preserved by geometric morphisms, and these admit what are known as classifying topoi. Briefly, a classifying topos for an internal geometric theory in a topos is a topos such that models of in any topos with a geometric morphism to are in one to one…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
