Recovering Joys Law as a Function of Solar Cycle, Hemisphere, and Longitude
Bruce H. McClintock, Aimee A. Norton

TL;DR
This study revises Joys law by analyzing solar active-region tilt angles over multiple solar cycles, hemisphere, and longitude, revealing cycle-dependent variations and hemispheric differences, with implications for solar magnetic field understanding.
Contribution
It provides a revised formulation of Joys law with weaker latitude dependence and highlights hemispheric and cycle variations in active-region tilt angles.
Findings
Hemispheric tilt angles vary significantly with solar cycle.
No dependence of tilt angles on longitude was found.
Cycle strength correlates with tilt angles in the southern hemisphere.
Abstract
Bipolar active regions in both hemispheres tend to be tilted with respect to the East West equator of the Sun in accordance with Joys law that describes the average tilt angle as a function of latitude. Mt. Wilson observatory data from 1917 to 1985 are used to analyze the active-region tilt angle as a function of solar cycle, hemisphere, and longitude, in addition to the more common dependence on latitude. Our main results are as follows: i) We recommend a revision of Joys law toward a weaker dependence on latitude (slope of 0.13 to 0.26) and without forcing the tilt to zero at the Equator. ii) We determine that the hemispheric mean tilt value of active regions varies with each solar cycle, although the noise from a stochastic process dominates and does not allow for a determination of the slope of Joys law on an 11-year time scale. iii) The hemispheric difference in mean tilt angles,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
