Do quiescent and active galaxies have different M_BH-sigma relations?
Jong-Hak Woo, Andreas Schulze, Daeseong Park, Wol-Rang Kang, Sang Chul, Kim, Dominik Riechers

TL;DR
This study compares the black hole mass-stellar velocity dispersion relations for quiescent and active galaxies, finding they are consistent when accounting for selection effects, which supports the calibration of black hole mass estimators.
Contribution
It provides a revised comparison of M-sigma relations for active and quiescent galaxies, incorporating homogeneous measurements and selection effect corrections.
Findings
Active and quiescent galaxies follow the same intrinsic M-sigma relation.
The virial factor f is estimated to be around 5.1 to 5.9.
Selection effects explain the apparent differences in the relations.
Abstract
To investigate the validity of the assumption that quiescent galaxies and active galaxies follow the same black hole mass - stellar velocity dispersion relation, as required for the calibration of M_BH estimators for broad line AGNs, we determine and compare the M-sigma relations, respectively, for quiescent and active galaxies. For the quiescent galaxy sample, composed of 72 dynamical M_BH measurements, we update sigma for 28 galaxies using homogeneous H-band measurements that are corrected for galaxy rotation. For active galaxies, we collect 25 reverberation-mapped AGNs and improve sigma measurement for two objects . Combining the two samples, we determine the virial factor , first by scaling the active galaxy sample to the M-sigma relation of quiescent galaxies, and second by simultaneously fitting the quiescent and active galaxy samples, as f=5.1_{-1.1}^{+1.5} and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
