Measurement of Muon Antineutrino Quasi-Elastic Scattering on a Hydrocarbon Target at E_{\nu} ~ 3.5 GeV
The MINERvA collaboration: L. Fields, J. Chvojka, L. Aliaga, O., Altinok, B. Baldin, A. Baumbaugh, A. Bodek, D. Boehnlein, S. Boyd, R., Bradford, W.K. Brooks, H. Budd, A. Butkevich, D.A. Martinez Caicedo, C.M., Castromonte, M.E. Christy, H. Chung, M. Clark, H. da Motta

TL;DR
This study measures muon antineutrino quasi-elastic scattering on hydrocarbon at around 3.5 GeV, comparing results to models and finding good agreement with a modified vector form factor approach.
Contribution
It provides the first flux-averaged differential cross-section measurement for muon antineutrino quasi-elastic interactions at this energy, testing and supporting specific theoretical models.
Findings
Good agreement with a model using M_A=0.99 GeV/c^2 and modified vector form factors.
Data at higher Q^2 favor the modified vector form factor interpretation.
Results constrain theoretical models of neutrino-nucleus interactions.
Abstract
We have isolated muon anti-neutrino charged-current quasi-elastic interactions occurring in the segmented scintillator tracking region of the MINERvA detector running in the NuMI neutrino beam at Fermilab. We measure the flux-averaged differential cross-section, d{\sigma}/dQ^2, and compare to several theoretical models of quasi-elastic scattering. Good agreement is obtained with a model where the nucleon axial mass, M_A, is set to 0.99 GeV/c^2 but the nucleon vector form factors are modified to account for the observed enhancement, relative to the free nucleon case, of the cross-section for the exchange of transversely polarized photons in electron-nucleus scattering. Our data at higher Q^2 favor this interpretation over an alternative in which the axial mass is increased.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
