Kervaire invariants and selfcoincidences
Ulrich Koschorke, Duane Randall

TL;DR
This paper explores how Kervaire invariants influence minimum numbers and Nielsen numbers in sphere maps, revealing new geometric coincidence phenomena and criteria related to the Kervaire invariant's behavior.
Contribution
It introduces the role of Kervaire invariants as obstructions in nonstable dimensions and compares them with Nielsen numbers, providing new geometric insights.
Findings
Kervaire invariant acts as an obstruction in nonstable dimensions
Nielsen numbers coincide with minimum numbers in stable ranges
Provides criteria for the vanishing of the Kervaire invariant on the 126-stem
Abstract
Minimum numbers decide e.g. whether a given map f: S^m --> S^n/G from a sphere into a spherical space form can be deformed to a map f' such that f(x) not equal f'(x) for all x in S^m. In this paper we compare minimum numbers to (geometrically defined) Nielsen numbers (which are more computable). In the stable dimension range these numbers coincide. But already in the first nonstable range (when m=2n-2) the Kervaire invariant appears as a decisive additional obstruction which detects interesting geometric coincidence phenomena. Similar results (involving e.g. Hopf invariants, taken mod 4) are obtained in the next seven dimension ranges (when 1<m-2n+3<9). The selfcoincidence context yields also a precise geometric criterion for the open question whether the Kervaire invariant vanishes on the 126-stem or not.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
