Predicting Future Space Near-IR Grism Surveys using the WFC3 Infrared Spectroscopic Parallels Survey
James W. Colbert, Harry Teplitz, Hakim Atek, Andrew Bunker, Marc, Rafelski, Nathaniel Ross, Claudia Scarlata, Alejandro Bedregal, Alberto, Dominguez, Alan Dressler, Alaina Henry, Matt Malkan, Crystal L. Martin, Dan, Masters, Patrick McCarthy, Brian Siana

TL;DR
This study uses the WISP survey to analyze near-infrared emission line counts and luminosity functions, providing insights into galaxy populations and evolution relevant for future space-based grism surveys.
Contribution
It offers the first detailed emission line counts and luminosity functions from the WISP survey, highlighting its sensitivity to faint galaxies and implications for future near-infrared grism missions.
Findings
WISP detects 1048 emission line galaxies, including 467 with multiple lines.
Fainter flux levels are probed than future missions, revealing more low-luminosity galaxies.
Luminosity functions show evolution mainly in the L* parameter with redshift.
Abstract
We present near-infrared emission line counts and luminosity functions from the HST WFC3 Infrared Spectroscopic Parallels (WISP) program for 29 fields (0.037 deg^2) observed using both the G102 and G141 grisms. Altogether we identify 1048 emission line galaxies with observed equivalent widths greater than 40 Angstroms, 467 of which have multiple detected emission lines. The WISP survey is sensitive to fainter flux levels (3-5x10^-17 ergs/s/cm^2) than the future space near-infrared grism missions aimed at baryonic acoustic oscillation cosmology (1-4x10^-16 ergs/s/cm^2), allowing us to probe the fainter emission line galaxies that the shallower future surveys may miss. Cumulative number counts of 0.7<z<1.5 galaxies reach 10,000 deg^-2 above an H-alpha flux of 2x10^-16 ergs/s/cm^2. H-alpha-emitting galaxies with comparable [OIII] flux are roughly 5 times less common than galaxies with just…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
