Spot the difference. Impact of different selection criteria on observed properties of passive galaxies in zCOSMOS 20-k sample
M. Moresco, L. Pozzetti, A. Cimatti, G. Zamorani, M. Bolzonella, F., Lamareille, M. Mignoli, E. Zucca, S.J. Lilly, C.M. Carollo, T. Contini, J.-P., Kneib, O. Le Fevre, V. Mainieri, A. Renzini, M. Scodeggio, S. Bardelli, A., Bongiorno, K. Caputi, O. Cucciati, S. de la Torre

TL;DR
This study compares how different selection criteria affect the observed properties and contamination levels of passive galaxies up to redshift 1 in the zCOSMOS survey, revealing biases and evolutionary trends.
Contribution
It systematically evaluates multiple selection methods for passive galaxies, proposing improved definitions and analyzing their impact on galaxy property measurements and mass assembly history.
Findings
Red & passive ETGs are the purest but less economical to select.
Red SED and quiescent criteria balance contamination and property accuracy.
Evidence of mass-assembly downsizing from z=1 to z=0.2.
Abstract
We present the analysis of photometric, spectroscopic, and morphological properties for differently selected samples of passive galaxies up to z=1 extracted from the zCOSMOS-20k spectroscopic survey. This analysis intends to explore the dependence of galaxy properties on the selection criterion adopted, study the degree of contamination due to star-forming outliers, and provide a comparison between different commonly used selection criteria. We extracted from the zCOSMOS-20k catalog six different samples of passive galaxies, based on morphology, optical colors, specific star-formation rate, a best fit to the observed spectral energy distribution, and a criterion that combines morphological, spectroscopic, and photometric information. The morphological sample has the higher percentage of contamination in colors, specific star formation rate and presence of emission lines, while the red &…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
