
TL;DR
This paper explains how the pilot-wave theory, an alternative interpretation of quantum mechanics, successfully accounts for spin phenomena, contrasting it with orthodox views and addressing related foundational theorems.
Contribution
It clarifies the pilot-wave account of spin and compares it with orthodox quantum mechanics, addressing misconceptions and foundational issues.
Findings
Pilot-wave theory can explain spin phenomena without ad hoc axioms.
Comparison between orthodox and pilot-wave accounts of spin.
Discussion of pilot-wave theory's relation to Kochen-Specker and Bell theorems.
Abstract
The alternative pilot-wave theory of quantum phenomena -- associated especially with Louis de Broglie, David Bohm, and John Bell -- reproduces the statistical predictions of ordinary quantum mechanics, but without recourse to special \emph{ad hoc} axioms pertaining to measurement. That (and how) it does so is relatively straightforward to understand in the case of position measurements and, more generally, measurements whose outcome is ultimately registered by the position of a pointer. Despite a widespread belief to the contrary among physicists, the theory can also account successfully for phenomena involving spin. The main goal of the paper is to explain how the pilot-wave theory's account of spin works. Along the way, we provide illuminating comparisons between the orthodox and pilot-wave accounts of spin and address some puzzles about how the pilot-wave theory relates to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
