Fractional Standard Map: Riemann-Liouville vs. Caputo
Mark Edelman

TL;DR
This paper compares the phase space properties of fractional standard maps derived from Riemann-Liouville and Caputo derivatives, revealing unique attractor behaviors and convergence properties due to memory effects.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of fractional standard maps with memory, highlighting differences between Riemann-Liouville and Caputo derivatives and identifying a new attractor type.
Findings
Attractors in fractional maps differ from classical systems, existing asymptotically.
Trajectories can intersect and lead to the same attractor, unlike in classical dynamics.
A new attractor type, 'cascade of bifurcation trajectories', is common to both maps.
Abstract
Properties of the phase space of the standard maps with memory obtained from the differential equations with the Riemann-Liouville and Caputo derivatives are considered. Properties of the attractors which these fractional dynamical systems demonstrate are different from properties of the regular and chaotic attractors of systems without memory: they exist in the asymptotic sense, different types of trajectories may lead to the same attracting points, trajectories may intersect, and chaotic attractors may overlap. Two maps have significant differences in the types of attractors they demonstrate and convergence of trajectories to the attracting points and trajectories. Still existence of the the most remarkable new type of attractors, "cascade of bifurcation type trajectories", is a common feature of both maps.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsChaos control and synchronization · Quantum chaos and dynamical systems · Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
