What Should be the Role of Field Energy in Introductory Physics Courses?
Robert Hilborn

TL;DR
This paper argues that due to the complexities of field energy, traditional potential energy concepts are more suitable for introductory physics education than the broader field energy framework suggested for K-12 science.
Contribution
It critically evaluates the role of field energy in science education frameworks and advocates for a focus on potential energy in introductory physics courses.
Findings
Field energy has ambiguities and complexities.
Traditional potential energy is more appropriate for introductory physics.
The K-12 framework emphasizes field energy, which may be less suitable at the secondary level.
Abstract
A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas gives the concept of field energy a prominent role in the physical sciences sections of its recommendations for K-12 science education. I examine what A Framework suggests for the role of field energy and point out that, given the ambiguities and complexities associated with field energy, a traditional approach focusing on potential (configuration) energy is more appropriate for introductory physics in secondary schools, colleges, and universities.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
