Comparison of solar surface flows inferred from time--distance helioseismology and coherent structure tracking using HMI/SDO observations
M. Svanda (1, 2), Th. Roudier (3), M. Rieutord (3), R. Burston (4),, L. Gizon (4) ((1) Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech, Republic, Ondrejov, Czech Republic (2) Astronomical Institute, Charles, University in Prague, Czech Republic (3) IRAP

TL;DR
This study compares two methods of measuring solar surface flows using HMI/SDO data, finding good correlation and agreement with Doppler measurements, enhancing confidence in helioseismic and tracking techniques.
Contribution
It provides a direct comparison and validation of helioseismic and coherent structure tracking methods for solar surface flow measurements.
Findings
Strong correlation between helioseismic and tracking flow measurements
Good agreement with Doppler line-of-sight velocities
Validation of vertical flow estimates from 3D inversions
Abstract
We compare measurements of horizontal flows on the surface of the Sun using helioseismic time--distance inversions and coherent structure tracking of solar granules. Tracking provides 2D horizontal flows on the solar surface, whereas the time--distance inversions estimate the full 3-D velocity flows in the shallow near-surface layers. Both techniques use HMI observations as an input. We find good correlations between the various measurements resulting from the two techniques. Further, we find a good agreement between these measurements and the time-averaged Doppler line-of-sight velocity, and also perform sanity checks on the vertical flow that resulted from the 3-D time--distance inversion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
