Validity of commonly used formula of nucleation work for bubble nucleation
Atsushi Mori

TL;DR
This paper revisits the formula for nucleation work, demonstrating its validity for bubble nucleation in incompressible parent phases, contrary to previous claims that it was only valid for incompressible nucleating phases.
Contribution
It clarifies and corrects the applicability of the nucleation work formula, showing it holds for incompressible parent phases like bubbles, not just for nucleating phases.
Findings
The formula is valid for bubble nucleation in incompressible parent phases.
Previous assumptions about the formula's limitations are revised.
The derivation confirms the formula's broader applicability.
Abstract
Nishioka and Kusaka [J. Chem. Phys. 96 (1992) 5370 (1992)] showed that the commonly used formula, W = n({\mu}^{\alpha}-{\mu}^{\beta}) + {\gamma}A, for work of formation of critical nucleus is derived by integrating the isothermal Gibbs-Duhem relation for the incompressible nucleating phase, such as an incompressible liquid phase nucleation in a vapor phase. In their paper as wel as in a subsequent paper [Li, Nishioka, and Holcomb, J. Cryst. Growth 171 (1997) 259] it was stated that the commonly used formula was valid for an incompressible nucleating phase and no longer held for such as a bubble nucleation. In this paper, we will amend this statement; that is, the commonly used formula is shown to hold for incompressible parent phase, such as a bubble nucleation in an incompressible parent phase.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
