On the stark difference in satellite distributions around the Milky Way and Andromeda

TL;DR

This study compares the radial distributions of bright dwarf satellites around the Milky Way and Andromeda, revealing a significant difference that may be due to observational incompleteness or underlying cosmological factors.

Contribution

It provides a detailed comparison of satellite distributions around MW and M31 and suggests potential observational biases affecting the Milky Way's satellite census.

Findings

MW satellites are more centrally concentrated than M31 satellites.

The observed distribution around M31 aligns with LCDM subhalo predictions.

Incompleteness in the MW satellite census could reconcile differences with models.

Abstract

We compare spherically-averaged radial number counts of bright (> 10^5 Lsun) dwarf satellite galaxies within 400 kpc of the Milky Way (MW) and M31 and find that the MW satellites are much more centrally concentrated. Remarkably, the two satellite systems are almost identical within the central 100 kpc, while M31 satellites outnumber MW satellites by about a factor of four at deprojected distances spanning 100 - 400 kpc. We compare the observed distributions to those predicted for LCDM suhbalos using a suite of 44 high-resolution ~10^12 halo zoom simulations, 22 of which are in pairs like the MW and M31. We find that the radial distribution of satellites around M31 is fairly typical of those predicted for subhalos, while the Milky Way's distribution is more centrally concentrated that any of our simulated LCDM halos. One possible explanation is that our census is bright (> 10^5 Lsun) MW dwarf galaxies is significantly incomplete beyond ~ 100 kpc of the Sun. If there were ~8 - 20 more bright dwarfs orbiting undetected at 100 - 400 kpc, then the Milky Way's radial distribution would fall within the range expected from subhalo distributions and alos look very much like the known M31 system. We use our simulations to demonstrate that there is enough area left unexplored by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey and its extensions that the discovery of ~10 new bright dwarfs is not implausible given the expected range of angular anisotropy of subhalos in the sky.