Volume term of work of critical nucleus formation in terms of chemical potential difference relative to equilibrium one
Atsushi Mori

TL;DR
This paper revisits the volume term in the work of critical nucleus formation, expressing it in terms of directly measurable chemical potential differences related to supersaturation, refining previous theoretical formulations.
Contribution
The paper derives a new expression for the volume term of nucleus formation work using measurable chemical potential differences, improving theoretical understanding.
Findings
Reformulated W_{vol} in terms of chemical potential difference between reservoir and equilibrium.
Clarified the relation between supersaturation and the work of nucleus formation.
Provided a more accessible way to measure nucleus formation work experimentally.
Abstract
The work of formation of a critical nucleus is sometimes written as W=n{\Delta}{\mu}+{\gamma}A. The first term W_{vol}=n{\Delta}{\mu} is called the volume term and the second term {\gamma}A the surface term with {\gamma} being the interfacial tension and A the area of the nucleus. Nishioka and Kusaka [J. Chem. Phys. 96 (1992) 5370] derived W_{vol}=n{\Delta}{\mu} with n=V_{\beta}/v_{\beta} and {\Delta}{\mu}={\mu}_{\beta}(T,p_{\alpha})-{\mu}_{\alpha}(T,p_{\alpha}) by rewriting W_{vol}=-(p_{\beta}-p_{\alpha})V_{\beta} by integrating the isothermal Gibbs-Duhem relation for an incompressible {\beta} phase, where {\alpha} and {\beta} represent the parent and nucleating phases, V_{\beta} is the volume of the nucleus, v_{\beta}, which is constant, the molecular volume of the {\beta} phase, {\mu}, T, and p denote the chemical potential, the temperature, and the pressure, respectively. We note…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
