Problems with Mannheim's conformal gravity program
Youngsub Yoon

TL;DR
The paper critiques Mannheim's conformal gravity, showing it fails to replicate Newtonian gravity at short distances without singularities and conflicts with laboratory experiments and galaxy rotation data.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis demonstrating that Mannheim's conformal gravity cannot reconcile with experimental tests and galaxy observations without problematic assumptions.
Findings
Fails to reduce to Newtonian gravity without singularities
Conflicts with Cavendish-type experiments on Earth
Produces negative linear potential for positive proton mass
Abstract
We show that Mannheim's conformal gravity program, whose potential has a term proportional to and another term proportional to , does not reduce to Newtonian gravity at short distances, unless one assumes undesirable singularities of the mass density of the proton. Therefore, despite the claim that it successfully explains galaxy rotation curves, unless one assumes the singularities, it seems to be falsified by numerous Cavendish-type experiments performed at laboratories on Earth whose work have not found any deviations from Newton's theory. Moreover, it can be shown that as long as the total mass of the proton is positive, Mannheim's conformal gravity program leads to negative linear potential, which is problematic from the point of view of fitting galaxy rotation curves, which necessarily requires positive linear potential.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
