Symmetric vs asymmetric stem cell divisions: an adaptation against cancer?
Leili Shahriyari, Natalia L. Komarova

TL;DR
This paper models tissue architecture to compare symmetric and asymmetric stem cell divisions, finding symmetric divisions reduce mutation rates and may be an adaptation to delay cancer onset.
Contribution
It introduces a stochastic model analyzing how symmetric and asymmetric stem cell divisions influence mutation accumulation and cancer risk, providing new insights into tissue organization.
Findings
Symmetric divisions generate fewer double-hit mutants than asymmetric ones.
The mutation reduction benefit of symmetric divisions is consistent across various mutant fitness levels.
Symmetric stem cell divisions may be an evolutionary adaptation to mitigate cancer risk.
Abstract
Traditionally, it has been held that a central characteristic of stem cells is their ability to divide asymmetrically. Recent advances in inducible genetic labeling provided ample evidence that symmetric stem cell divisions play an important role in adult mammalian homeostasis. It is well understood that the two types of cell divisions differ in terms of the stem cells' flexibility to expand when needed. On the contrary, the implications of symmetric and asymmetric divisions for mutation accumulation are still poorly understood. In this paper we study a stochastic model of a renewing tissue, and address the optimization problem of tissue architecture in the context of mutant production. Specifically, we study the process of tumor suppressor gene inactivation which usually takes place as a sequence of two consecutive "hits", and which is one of the most common patterns in carcinogenesis.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
