Constraining Neutrino Mass from Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay
P. S. Bhupal Dev, Srubabati Goswami, Manimala Mitra, Werner, Rodejohann

TL;DR
This paper re-evaluates the neutrinoless double beta decay claim in light of new experimental limits and nuclear matrix element calculations, exploring implications for neutrino mass models and right-handed sector constraints.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the compatibility of $0 uetaeta$ observations with recent experimental limits and theoretical models, including heavy neutrino contributions in Left-Right symmetric frameworks.
Findings
The $^{76}$Ge claim is mostly compatible with individual $^{136}$Xe limits but not with combined limits.
Canonical light neutrino contributions cannot explain the $0 uetaeta$ signature under current constraints.
Heavy neutrino contributions can saturate the current $0 uetaeta$ limits, imposing lower bounds on the lightest neutrino mass.
Abstract
We re-analyze the compatibility of the claimed observation of neutrinoless double beta decay () in Ge with the new limits on the half-life of Xe from EXO-200 and KamLAND-Zen. Including recent calculations of the nuclear matrix elements (NMEs), we show that while the claim in Ge is still compatible with the individual limits from Xe, it is inconsistent with the KamLAND-Zen+EXO-200 combined limit for all but one NME calculations. After imposing the most stringent upper limit on the sum of light neutrino masses from Planck, we find that the canonical light neutrino contribution cannot satisfy the claimed signature or saturate the current limit, irrespective of the NME uncertainties. However, inclusion of the heavy neutrino contributions, arising naturally in TeV-scale Left-Right symmetric models, can saturate the current limit…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
