On the Steinhaus tiling problem in three dimensions
Daniel Goldstein, R. Daniel Mauldin

TL;DR
This paper investigates the existence of Steinhaus sets in three-dimensional space, providing heuristic evidence suggesting such sets do not exist, extending the classical problem from two to three dimensions.
Contribution
It offers the first heuristic analysis indicating the non-existence of Steinhaus sets in three dimensions, building on prior two-dimensional constructions.
Findings
Heuristic evidence against the existence of Steinhaus sets in R^3.
Extension of Steinhaus problem from 2D to 3D.
Supports the conjecture that no such sets exist in three dimensions.
Abstract
H. Steinhaus asked in the 1950's whether there exists a set in the plane R^2 meeting every isometric copy of Z^2 in precisely one point. Such a "Steinhaus set" was constructed by Jackson and Mauldin. What about three-space R^3? Is there a subset of R^3 meeting every isometric copy of Z^3 in exactly one point? We offer heuristic evidence that the answer is "no".
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Quasicrystal Structures and Properties
