Comment on "Quantized Orbital Angular Momentum Transfer and Magnetic Dichroism in the Interaction of Electron Vortices with Matter"
Peter Schattschneider, Stefan L\"offler, Johan Verbeeck

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous claim that electron vortex beams can be used for magnetic dichroism measurements, showing that the effect is limited to very small nanoparticles due to a key constraint.
Contribution
It clarifies the limitations of angular momentum transfer in electron vortex interactions, challenging prior assumptions about EMCD feasibility.
Findings
EMCD signal is only strong for nanoparticles 1-2 nm in size.
Angular momentum transfer selection rule applies only at the vortex center.
Previous claims overestimated the applicability of vortex beams for magnetic dichroism.
Abstract
It was claimed (Lloyd et al., PRL 108 (2012) 074802) that energy loss magnetic chiral dichroism (EMCD) with electron vortex beams is feasible, and has even advantages over the standard setup with Bragg diffracted waves. In this Comment, we show that Lloyd et al. ignored an important constraint on the proposed selection rule for the transfer of angular momentum in the interaction, namely that it is only valid for an atom located in the very center of the vortex. As an experimental consequence, the EMCD signal will only be strong for extremely small nanoparticles of 1 to 2 nm diameter.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
