Contrasting behaviour from two Be/X-ray binary pulsars: insights into differing neutron star accretion modes
L. J. Townsend (Southampton), S. P. Drave (Southampton), A. B. Hill, (SLAC), M. J. Coe (Southampton), R. H. D. Corbet (UMBC/NASA GSFC), A. J., Bird (Southampton)

TL;DR
This study identifies and characterizes two Be/X-ray binary pulsars in the Small Magellanic Cloud, revealing different neutron star accretion behaviors and providing new orbital and spectral data for one of the systems.
Contribution
The paper presents the first detailed characterization of a new Be/X-ray binary pulsar and clarifies the identity of a previously known pulsar, highlighting differing accretion modes.
Findings
Discovery of a new Be/X-ray binary pulsar with orbital period 87 days.
Confirmation that the second pulsar is the previously known SXP91.1.
Evidence of continuous spin-up during X-ray quiescence for SXP91.1.
Abstract
In this paper we present the identification of two periodic X-ray signals coming from the direction of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). On detection with the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE), the 175.4s and 85.4s pulsations were considered to originate from new Be/X-ray binary (BeXRB) pulsars with unknown locations. Using rapid follow-up INTEGRAL and XMM-Newton observations, we show the first pulsar (designated SXP175) to be coincident with a candidate high-mass X-ray binary (HMXB) in the northern bar region of the SMC undergoing a small Type II outburst. The orbital period (87d) and spectral class (B0-B0.5IIIe) of this system are determined and presented here for the first time. The second pulsar is shown not to be new at all, but is consistent with being SXP91.1 - a pulsar discovered at the very beginning of the 13 year long RXTE key monitoring programme of the SMC. Whilst it is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
