The massive end of the luminosity and stellar mass functions: Dependence on the fit to the light profile
M. Bernardi, A. Meert, R. K. Sheth, V. Vikram, M. Huertas-Company, S., Mei, F. Shankar

TL;DR
This study shows that the method used to fit galaxy light profiles significantly affects the estimated stellar mass function, especially at the high-mass end, impacting our understanding of galaxy growth and mass assembly.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of luminosity and stellar mass functions based on different light profile fits, highlighting the impact on massive galaxy measurements.
Findings
PyMorph fits yield more light and larger stellar masses.
The stellar mass density at z~0.1 is 1.2 times larger than previous estimates.
Number density of massive galaxies is about 5 times higher at M* > 6 x 10^{11} Msun.
Abstract
In addition to the large systematic differences arising from assumptions about the stellar mass-to-light ratio, the massive end of the stellar mass function is rather sensitive to how one fits the light profiles of the most luminous galaxies. We quantify this by comparing the luminosity and stellar mass functions based on SDSS cmodel magnitudes, and PyMorph single-Sersic and Sersic-Exponential fits to the surface brightness profiles of galaxies in the SDSS. The PyMorph fits return more light, so that the predicted masses are larger than when cmodel magnitudes are used. As a result, the total stellar mass density at z~0.1 is about 1.2x larger than in our previous analysis of the SDSS. The differences are most pronounced at the massive end, where the measured number density of objects having M* > 6 x 10^{11} Msun is ~5x larger. Alternatively, at number densities of 10^{-6} Mpc^{-3}, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
