Forbidding a Set Difference of Size 1
Imre Leader, Eoin Long

TL;DR
This paper establishes upper bounds on the size of set families avoiding pairs with a difference of exactly one element, showing these bounds are tight up to a constant factor, and extends results to differences of size k.
Contribution
It proves tight bounds on the maximum size of families avoiding specific set differences, generalizing to differences of size k.
Findings
Families avoiding |A extbackslash B|=1 are at most (2+o(1))/n times the middle binomial coefficient.
The bounds are tight up to a constant factor of 2.
Similar bounds are obtained for differences of size k, with size at most C_k/n^k times the middle binomial coefficient.
Abstract
How large can a family \cal A \subset \cal P [n] be if it does not contain A,B with |A\setminus B| = 1? Our aim in this paper is to show that any such family has size at most \frac{2+o(1)}{n} \binom {n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor }. This is tight up to a multiplicative constant of . We also obtain similar results for families \cal A \subset \cal P[n] with |A\setminus B| \neq k, showing that they satisfy |{\mathcal A}| \leq \frac{C_k}{n^k}\binom {n}{\lfloor n/2\rfloor }, where C_k is a constant depending only on k.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · Advanced Graph Theory Research
