A study of local and non-local spatial densities in quantum field theory
R.E. Wagner, M.R. Ware, E.V. Stefanovich, Q. Su, R. Grobe

TL;DR
This paper compares two methods for defining particle position in quantum field theory using a 1D model, revealing differences in localization, causality, and evolution speed.
Contribution
It introduces a comparative analysis of local and non-local spatial densities in quantum field theory, highlighting their distinct physical implications.
Findings
Newton-Wigner density allows arbitrarily narrow localization
Superluminal spreading occurs with the Newton-Wigner approach
Field operator density prevents localized states and ensures subluminal evolution
Abstract
We use a one-dimensional model system to compare the predictions of two different 'yardsticks' to compute the position of a particle from its quantum field theoretical state. Based on the first yardstick (defined by the Newton-Wigner position operator), the spatial density can be arbitrarily narrow and its time-evolution is superluminal for short time intervals. Furthermore, two spatially distant particles might be able to interact with each other outside the light cone, which is manifested by an asymmetric spreading of the spatial density. The second yardstick (defined by the quantum field operator) does not permit localized states and the time evolution is subluminal.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
