Twenty-Five Shades of Greycite: Semantics for referencing and preservation
Phillip Lord, Lindsay Marshall

TL;DR
This paper explores how semantic metadata can enhance referencing, preservation, and author incentives in grey literature, promoting richer, more interpretable scholarly documents.
Contribution
It introduces methods for embedding semantic metadata in grey literature to improve referencing, digital preservation, and author engagement.
Findings
Enhanced referencing through semantic metadata
Improved digital preservation and non-repudiation
Customisation of semantics for grey literature
Abstract
Semantic publishing can enable richer documents with clearer, computationally interpretable properties. For this vision to become reality, however, authors must benefit from this process, so that they are incentivised to add these semantics. Moreover, the publication process that generates final content must allow and enable this semantic content. Here we focus on author-led or "grey" literature, which uses a convenient and simple publication pipeline. We describe how we have used metadata in articles to enable richer referencing of these articles and how we have customised the addition of these semantics to articles. Finally, we describe how we use the same semantics to aid in digital preservation and non-repudiability of research articles.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSemantic Web and Ontologies · Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Scientific Computing and Data Management
