Cosmological constraints from baryon acoustic oscillations and clustering of large-scale structure
Graeme E. Addison, Gary Hinshaw, Mark Halpern

TL;DR
This paper combines BAO and large-scale structure measurements across a wide redshift range to constrain cosmological parameters, improving precision and exploring tensions between different data sets within standard cosmological models.
Contribution
It provides new constraints on cosmological parameters using combined BAO and LSS data without relying solely on CMB calibration, and examines tensions among various cosmological measurements.
Findings
BAO data constrains _m .03 in flat CDM
Adding LSS data tightens parameter constraints significantly
LSS data prefers lower H_0 and higher _m than local measurements
Abstract
We constrain cosmological parameters using combined measurements of the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature in the correlation function of galaxies and Ly-\alpha absorbers that together cover 0.1 < z < 2.4. The BAO position measurements alone -- without fixing the absolute sound horizon `standard ruler' length with cosmic microwave background (CMB) data -- constrain \Omega_m = 0.303 +/- 0.040 (68 per cent confidence) for a flat \Lambda CDM model, and w = -1.06^{+0.33}_{-0.32}, \Omega_m = 0.292^{+0.045}_{-0.040} for a flat wCDM model. Adding other large-scale structure (LSS) clustering constraints -- correlation function shape, the Alcock-Paczynski test and growth rate information -- to the BAO considerably tightens constraints (\Omega_m = 0.290 +/- 0.019, H_0 = 67.5 +/- 2.8 km s^{-1} Mpc^{-1}, \sigma_8 = 0.80 +/- 0.05 for \Lambda CDM, and w = -1.14 +/- 0.19 for wCDM). The LSS data…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
