Are elite journals declining?
Vincent Lariviere, George A. Lozano, Yves Gingras

TL;DR
Over the past 40 years, elite journals have published a decreasing proportion of top-cited papers, while new journals are increasingly publishing highly cited work, indicating a shift in the landscape of scientific publishing and journal hierarchy.
Contribution
This study provides a longitudinal analysis of citation patterns in elite versus emerging journals, revealing changing dynamics in journal prestige and impact over four decades.
Findings
Elite journals publish fewer top 1% cited papers over time.
Science and Nature's share of top-cited papers has declined.
New and established journals are publishing more highly cited papers.
Abstract
Previous work indicates that over the past 20 years, the highest quality work have been published in an increasingly diverse and larger group of journals. In this paper we examine whether this diversification has also affected the handful of elite journals that are traditionally considered to be the best. We examine citation patterns over the past 40 years of 7 long-standing traditionally elite journals and 6 journals that have been increasing in importance over the past 20 years. To be among the top 5% or 1% cited papers, papers now need about twice as many citations as they did 40 years ago. Since the late 1980s and early 1990s elite journals have been publishing a decreasing proportion of these top cited papers. This also applies to the two journals that are typically considered as the top venues and often used as bibliometric indicators of "excellence", Science and Nature. On the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsscientometrics and bibliometrics research · Academic Publishing and Open Access
