Optimal Taylor-Couette flow: Radius ratio dependence
Rodolfo Ostilla Monico, Sander G. Huisman, Tim J. G. Jannink, Dennis, P. M. van Gils, Roberto Verzicco, Siegfried Grossmann, Chao Sun, Detlef, Lohse

TL;DR
This study investigates how the radius ratio affects the flow dynamics and optimal transport conditions in Taylor-Couette systems through extensive numerical simulations and experiments, revealing radius ratio-dependent optimal Rossby numbers and scaling laws.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the radius ratio dependence of optimal transport and flow profiles in Taylor-Couette flow, combining high-Reynolds-number experiments with numerical simulations.
Findings
Effective torque scaling laws independent of radius ratio at high Ta.
Optimal Rossby number depends on radius ratio and saturates at high Ta.
Flat bulk angular velocity profiles are linked to maximum transport efficiency.
Abstract
Taylor-Couette flow with independently rotating inner (i) and outer (o) cylinders is explored numerically and experimentally to determine the effects of the radius ratio {\eta} on the system response. Numerical simulations reach Reynolds numbers of up to Re_i=9.5 x 10^3 and Re_o=5x10^3, corresponding to Taylor numbers of up to Ta=10^8 for four different radius ratios {\eta}=r_i/r_o between 0.5 and 0.909. The experiments, performed in the Twente Turbulent Taylor-Couette (T^3C) setup, reach Reynolds numbers of up to Re_i=2x10^6$ and Re_o=1.5x10^6, corresponding to Ta=5x10^{12} for {\eta}=0.714-0.909. Effective scaling laws for the torque J^{\omega}(Ta) are found, which for sufficiently large driving Ta are independent of the radius ratio {\eta}. As previously reported for {\eta}=0.714, optimum transport at a non-zero Rossby number Ro=r_i|{\omega}_i-{\omega}_o|/[2(r_o-r_i){\omega}_o] is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
