The abundance of voids and the excursion set formalism
Elise Jennings, Yin Li, Wayne Hu

TL;DR
This paper measures the abundance of cosmic voids in dark matter simulations, compares models to observations, and finds that a volume conserving model best matches the data across various scales and redshifts.
Contribution
It introduces a volume conserving model for void abundance that aligns closely with simulation results and compares it to existing models, highlighting discrepancies.
Findings
Volume conserving model matches void abundance within 16% for 1< r(Mpc/h)<15
Sheth & van de Weygaert model overpredicts void abundances
Void distributions in halos differ from dark matter, affecting cosmological analyses
Abstract
We present measurements of the number density of voids in the dark matter distribution from a series of N-body simulations of a \Lambda CDM cosmology. We define voids as spherical regions of \rho_v = 0.2\rho_m around density minima in order to relate our results to the predicted abundances using the excursion set formalism. Using a linear underdensity of \delta_v = -2.7, from a spherical evolution model, we find that a volume conserving model, which does not conserve number density in the mapping from the linear to nonlinear regime, matches the measured abundance to within 16% for a range of void radii 1< r(Mpc/h)<15. This model fixes the volume fraction of the universe which is in voids and assumes that voids of a similar size merge as they expand by a factor of 1.7 to achieve a nonlinear density of \rho_v = 0.2\rho_m today. We find that the model of Sheth & van de Weygaert (2004) for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
