Automating the Dispute Resolution in Task Dependency Network
Ioan Alfred Letia, Adrian Groza

TL;DR
This paper presents a framework for automating dispute resolution in task dependency networks by integrating contract law principles to manage disruptions and penalties effectively.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach that incorporates legal principles into task dependency models for automated dispute resolution.
Findings
Effective integration of contract law principles into task networks
Reduction in dispute resolution time and costs
Improved robustness of supply chain management
Abstract
When perturbation or unexpected events do occur, agents need protocols for repairing or reforming the supply chain. Unfortunate contingency could increase too much the cost of performance, while breaching the current contract may be more efficient. In our framework the principles of contract law are applied to set penalties: expectation damages, opportunity cost, reliance damages, and party design remedies, and they are introduced in the task dependency model
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSupply Chain and Inventory Management · Auction Theory and Applications · Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
