A Social Welfare Optimal Sequential Allocation Procedure
Thomas Kalinowski, Nina Nardoytska, Toby Walsh

TL;DR
This paper analyzes a sequential allocation method for indivisible items, demonstrating that alternating turns maximize expected social welfare and remain optimal even with strategic agents, with utilities computable efficiently.
Contribution
It proves that alternating turn allocation maximizes expected social welfare and that this mechanism is robust to strategic behavior, with utilities computable in polynomial time.
Findings
Expected utility per agent is polynomial-time computable.
Alternating turns maximize expected utilitarian social welfare.
Mechanism remains optimal under strategic agent behavior.
Abstract
We consider a simple sequential allocation procedure for sharing indivisible items between agents in which agents take turns to pick items. Supposing additive utilities and independence between the agents, we show that the expected utility of each agent is computable in polynomial time. Using this result, we prove that the expected utilitarian social welfare is maximized when agents take alternate turns. We also argue that this mechanism remains optimal when agents behave strategically
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Auction Theory and Applications · Economic theories and models
