The HETDEX Pilot Survey. IV. The Evolution of [O II] Emitting Galaxies from z ~ 0.5 to z ~ 0
Robin Ciardullo, Caryl Gronwall, Joshua J. Adams, Guillermo A. Blanc,, Karl Gebhardt, Steven L. Finkelstein, Shardha Jogee, Gary J. Hill, Niv Drory,, Ulrich Hopp, Donald P. Schneider, Gregory R. Zeimann, and Gavin B. Dalton

TL;DR
This study analyzes the evolution of [O II] emitting galaxies from redshift 0.5 to 0, showing a decline in luminosity, equivalent widths, and overall star formation rate density over the last 5 billion years.
Contribution
It provides the first [O II]-based measurements of star formation rate density evolution in the z ~ 0.5 to 0 range, using data from the HETDEX pilot survey.
Findings
Luminosity function L* decreases by ~0.6-0.9 dex over 5 Gyr.
Fraction of high equivalent-width emitters declines with time.
Star formation rate density decreases by a factor of ~2.5 from z ~ 0.5 to 0.
Abstract
We present an analysis of the luminosities and equivalent widths of the 284 z < 0.56 [O II]-emitting galaxies found in the 169 square arcmin pilot survey for the Hobby-Eberly Telescope Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX). By combining emission-line fluxes obtained from the Mitchell spectrograph on the McDonald 2.7-m telescope with deep broadband photometry from archival data, we derive each galaxy's de-reddened [O II] 3727 luminosity and calculate its total star formation rate. We show that over the last ~5 Gyr of cosmic time there has been substantial evolution in the [O II] emission-line luminosity function, with L* decreasing by ~0.6 +/-0.2 dex in the observed function, and by ~0.9 +/-0.2 dex in the de-reddened relation. Accompanying this decline is a significant shift in the distribution of [O II] equivalent widths, with the fraction of high equivalent-width emitters declining…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
