High rigidity Forbush decreases: due to CMEs or shocks?
Arun Babu, H. M. Antia, S. R. Dugad, S. K. Gupta, Y. Hayashi, S., Kawakami, P. K. Mohanty, T. Nonaka, A. Oshima, P. Subramanian

TL;DR
This study investigates whether high rigidity Forbush decreases are mainly caused by Earth-directed CMEs or their shocks, finding that CMEs are the primary contributors based on model fits to muon data.
Contribution
The paper introduces a comparative modeling approach to distinguish the dominant cause of high rigidity FDs, emphasizing the role of turbulence levels in CME sheaths versus shock sheaths.
Findings
CME-only model fits require turbulence levels close to quiet solar wind.
Shock-only model fits require much higher turbulence levels.
Results favor CMEs as the main cause of high rigidity FDs.
Abstract
We seek to identify the primary agents causing Forbush decreases (FDs) observed at the Earth in high rigidity cosmic rays. In particular, we ask if such FDs are caused mainly by coronal mass ejections (CMEs) from the Sun that are directed towards the Earth, or by their associated shocks. We use the muon data at cutoff rigidities ranging from 14 to 24 GV from the GRAPES-3 tracking muon telescope to identify FD events. We select those FD events that have a reasonably clean profile, and can be reasonably well associated with an Earth-directed CME and its associated shock. We employ two models: one that considers the CME as the sole cause of the FD (the CME-only model) and one that considers the shock as the only agent causing the FD (the shock-only model). We use an extensive set of observationally determined parameters for both these models. The only free parameter in these models is the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
