Modeling the near-UV band of GK stars, Paper III: Dependence on abundance pattern
C. Ian Short, Eamonn A. Campbell

TL;DR
This study investigates how different abundance patterns and NLTE modeling affect the determination of stellar parameters from the near-UV spectra of GK stars, highlighting the importance of chemical composition and wavelength region in spectral fitting.
Contribution
It extends NLTE spectral models to include updated abundance patterns and alpha-enhancement, analyzing their impact on effective temperature and gravity estimates from observed spectra.
Findings
GASS10 abundances slightly lower T_eff for late-type giants
NLTE models with GASS10 better match T_eff calibrations
Fitting results depend on wavelength region and line blanketing effects
Abstract
We extend the grid of NLTE models presented in Paper II to explore variations in abundance pattern in two ways: 1) The adoption of the Asplund et al. (2009) (GASS10) abundances, 2) For stars of metallicity, [M/H], of -0.5, the adoption of a non-solar enhancement of alpha-elements by +0.3 dex. Moreover, our grid of synthetic spectral energy distributions (SEDs) is interpolated to a finer numerical resolution in both T_eff (Delta T_eff = 25 K) and log g (Delta log g = 0.25). We compare the values of T_eff and log g inferred from fitting LTE and Non-LTE SEDs to observed SEDs throughout the entire visible band, and in an ad hoc "blue" band. We compare our spectrophotometrically derived T_eff values to a variety of T_eff calibrations, including more empirical ones, drawn from the literature. For stars of solar metallicity, we find that the adoption of the GASS10 abundances lowers the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
