To be or not to be social: Foraging associations of free-ranging dogs in an urban ecosystem

TL;DR

This study investigates the social foraging behavior of free-ranging urban dogs, revealing that their associations are non-random and influenced by reproductive and social factors, rather than being purely chance-based.

Contribution

It provides the first detailed analysis of the social organization and foraging associations of free-ranging dogs in an urban environment, highlighting the non-random nature of their group formation.

Findings

Dogs tend to forage singly but form non-random groups.

Associations are influenced by mating season and age-related social preferences.

Group formation is driven by social and reproductive factors, not chance.

Abstract

Canids display a wide diversity of social systems, from solitary to pairs to packs, and hence they have been extensively used as model systems to understand social dynamics in natural systems. Among canids, the dog can show various levels of social organization due to the influence of humans on their lives. Though the dog is known as man's best friend and has been studied extensively as a pet, studies on the natural history, ecology and behaviour of dogs in a natural habitat are rare. Here we report results of an extensive population-level study conducted through one-time censuses in urban India to understand the ecoethology of free-ranging dogs. We built a model to test if the observed groups could have been formed through random associations while foraging. Our modeling results suggest that the dogs, like all efficient scavengers, tend to forage singly but also form random uncorrelated groups. A closer inspection of the group compositions however reveals that the foraging associations are non-random events. The tendency of adults to associate with the opposite sex in the mating season and of juveniles to stay close to adults in the non-mating season drives the population towards aggregation, in spite of the apparently random nature of the group size distribution. Hence we conclude that to be or not to be social is a matter of choice for the free-ranging dogs, and not a matter of chance.