Nonexistence of Quantum Nonlocality
Robert B. Griffiths

TL;DR
This paper argues that violations of Bell inequalities do not imply nonlocality but rather highlight the nonclassical nature of quantum mechanics, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing quantum from classical physics.
Contribution
It clarifies the misconception that Bell inequality violations prove nonlocality, emphasizing the nonclassical aspects of quantum mechanics instead.
Findings
Bell violations indicate nonclassicality, not nonlocality.
Misinterpretations arise from conflating quantum and classical physics.
The paper refutes the nonlocality implication of Bell inequalities.
Abstract
What violations of Bell inequalities teach us is that the world is quantum mechanical, i.e., nonclassical. Assertions that they imply the world is nonlocal arise from ignoring differences between quantum and classical physics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
