Hierarchies in independence logic
Pietro Galliani, Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen

TL;DR
This paper explores the expressive capabilities of various fragments of inclusion and independence logic under different semantics, establishing their relationships with existential second-order logic and revealing their equivalences.
Contribution
It characterizes the expressive power of restricted fragments of inclusion and independence logic and compares their semantics, connecting them to well-known logical systems.
Findings
Fragments with limited universal quantifiers relate to existential second-order logic.
Under strict semantics, inclusion logic equals existential second-order logic.
The study clarifies the impact of semantics on the expressive power of these logics.
Abstract
We study the expressive power of fragments of inclusion and independence logic defined either by restricting the number of universal quantifiers or the arity of inclusion and independence atoms in formulas. Assuming the so-called lax semantics for these logics, we relate these fragments of inclusion and independence logic to familiar sublogics of existential second-order logic. We also show that, with respect to the stronger strict semantics, inclusion logic is equivalent to existential second-order logic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · Logic, programming, and type systems
