Nonlinear stochastic biasing of halos: Analysis of cosmological N-body simulations and perturbation theories
Masanori Sato, Takahiko Matsubara

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the stochastic biasing of halos using cosmological N-body simulations and compares the results with perturbation theories, demonstrating the high accuracy of integrated perturbation theory in predicting cross-correlation coefficients across various scales and redshifts.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed comparison between N-body simulations and perturbation theories, showing the effectiveness of integrated perturbation theory in modeling halo biasing.
Findings
iPT matches simulation results within 0.5-1% on relevant scales.
SPT with local bias struggles on quasilinear scales at low redshifts.
iPT accurately predicts cross-correlation coefficients down to quasilinear regimes.
Abstract
It is crucial to understand and model a behavior of galaxy biasing for future ambitious galaxy redshift surveys. Using 40 large cosmological N-body simulations for a standard LambdaCDM cosmology, we study the cross-correlation coefficient between matter and the halo density field, which is an indicator of the stochasticity of bias, over a wide redshift range 0\le z \le 3. The cross-correlation coefficient is important to extract information on the matter density field, e.g., by combining galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements. We compare the simulation results with integrated perturbation theory (iPT) proposed by one of the present authors and standard perturbation theory (SPT) combined with a phenomenological model of local bias. The cross-correlation coefficient derived from the iPT agrees with N-body simulation results down to r~15 (10) h^{-1}Mpc within 0.5 (1.0) %…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
