Inefficiency of classically simulating linear optical quantum computing with Fock-state inputs
Bryan T. Gard, Jonathan P. Olson, Robert M. Cross, Moochan B. Kim,, Hwang Lee, Jonathan P. Dowling

TL;DR
This paper provides an elementary quantum optics-based proof that simulating linear optical quantum computing with Fock-state inputs is computationally infeasible due to exponential Hilbert space growth and permanent calculation complexity.
Contribution
It offers a straightforward, physics-based argument for the classical intractability of simulating such quantum systems, complementing prior complexity-theoretic approaches.
Findings
Hilbert space dimension scales exponentially with resources
Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures are not computationally equivalent
Bosonic interferometer simulation complexity linked to permanent calculation
Abstract
Aaronson and Arkhipov recently used computational complexity theory to argue that classical computers very likely cannot efficiently simulate linear, multimode, quantum-optical interferometers with arbitrary Fock-state inputs [Aaronson and Arkhipov, Theory Comput. 9, 143 (2013)]. Here we present an elementary argument that utilizes only techniques from quantum optics. We explicitly construct the Hilbert space for such an interferometer and show that its dimension scales exponentially with all the physical resources. We also show in a simple example just how the Schr\"odinger and Heisenberg pictures of quantum theory, while mathematically equivalent, are not in general computationally equivalent. Finally, we conclude our argument by comparing the symmetry requirements of multiparticle bosonic to fermionic interferometers and, using simple physical reasoning, connect the nonsimulatability…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
