Critical scaling in random-field systems: 2 or 3 independent exponents?
Gilles Tarjus, Ivan Balog, Matthieu Tissier

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that the critical behavior of random-field systems generally requires more than two exponents to describe, highlighting the importance of rare events overlooked by previous theories, though numerical results are inconclusive.
Contribution
It challenges the two-exponent scaling hypothesis in random-field systems by providing a comprehensive theoretical analysis across the (d,N) domain.
Findings
Two or more independent exponents are needed to describe critical scaling.
Rare events play a crucial role in the critical behavior.
Numerical estimates are consistent with both two-exponent and multi-exponent scenarios.
Abstract
We show that the critical scaling behavior of random-field systems with short-range interactions and disorder correlations cannot be described in general by only two independent exponents, contrary to previous claims. This conclusion is based on a theoretical description of the whole (d,N) domain of the d-dimensional random-field O(N) model and points to the role of rare events that are overlooked by the proposed derivations of two-exponent scaling. Quite strikingly, however, the numerical estimates of the critical exponents of the random field Ising model are extremely close to the predictions of the two-exponent scaling, so that the issue cannot be decided on the basis of numerical simulations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
