Momentum relation and classical limit in the future-not-included complex action theory
Keiichi Nagao, Holger Bech Nielsen

TL;DR
This paper investigates the momentum relation and classical limit in the future-not-included complex action theory, revealing that the standard relation does not hold and providing a corrected formulation with implications for classical dynamics.
Contribution
It introduces the correct momentum relation for the future-not-included complex action theory and links it to a real action-based classical theory, extending previous work.
Findings
The standard momentum relation is invalid in the future-not-included theory.
A corrected momentum relation is derived using a formal Lagrangian approach.
The classical limit is described by a real action, connecting to classical mechanics.
Abstract
Studying the time development of the expectation value in the future-not-included complex action theory, we point out that the momentum relation (the relation analogous to ), which was derived via the Feynman path integral and was shown to be correct in the future-included theory in our previous papers, is not valid in the future-not-included theory. We provide the correct momentum relation in the future-not-included theory, and argue that the future-not-included classical theory is described by a certain real action. In addition, we provide another way to understand the time development of the future-not-included theory by utilizing the future-included theory. Furthermore, properly applying the method used in our previous paper to the future-not-included theory by introducing a formal Lagrangian, we derive the correct momentum relation in the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
