Determination of z~0.8 neutral hydrogen fluctuations using the 21 cm intensity mapping auto-correlation
E. R. Switzer, K. W. Masui, K. Bandura, L.-M. Calin, T.-C. Chang,, X.-L. Chen, Y.-C. Li, Y.-W. Liao, A. Natarajan, U.-L. Pen, J. B. Peterson, J., R. Shaw, T. C. Voytek

TL;DR
This paper presents the first measurement of neutral hydrogen fluctuations at redshift ~0.8 using 21 cm intensity mapping auto-correlation, combining data from the Green Bank Telescope with foreground removal and Bayesian analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a novel auto-power spectrum analysis of 21 cm intensity fluctuations at z~0.8, providing constraints on Omega_HI and HI bias, and demonstrates foreground removal techniques.
Findings
Measured Omega_HI b_HI = [0.62^{+0.23}_{-0.15}] * 10^{-3} at 68% confidence
Established upper bounds on 21 cm signal despite foreground contamination
Identified observational challenges and future plans for improvement
Abstract
The large-scale distribution of neutral hydrogen in the Universe will be luminous through its 21 cm emission. Here, for the first time, we use the auto-power spectrum of 21 cm intensity fluctuations to constrain neutral hydrogen fluctuations at z~0.8. Our data were acquired with the Green Bank Telescope and span the redshift range 0.6 < z < 1 over two fields totalling ~41 deg. sq. and 190 h of radio integration time. The dominant synchrotron foregrounds exceed the signal by ~10^3, but have fewer degrees of freedom and can be removed efficiently. Even in the presence of residual foregrounds, the auto-power can still be interpreted as an upper bound on the 21 cm signal. Our previous measurements of the cross-correlation of 21 cm intensity and the WiggleZ galaxy survey provide a lower bound. Through a Bayesian treatment of signal and foregrounds, we can combine both fields in auto- and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
