Reply to "Comment on Strangeness -2 hypertriton"
H. Garcilazo, A. Valcarce
TL;DR
This paper challenges previous conclusions about the strangeness -2 hypertriton, questioning their validity and providing a counter-argument to earlier claims.
Contribution
It offers a critical response that disputes prior findings on the properties of the strangeness -2 hypertriton.
Findings
Previous conclusions are questionable
Counter-arguments are presented against earlier claims
The validity of earlier results is challenged
Abstract
In this Reply we argue that the conclusions derived in Ref. arXiv:1301.1241 are questionable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Mental Health Research Topics · Quantum Mechanics and Applications